Sunday, November 2, 2008

CD 01 - Addition To History

Lewis Hamilton becomes the World Champion and Barack Obama becomes the President of the United States.

DISCALIMER: I rooted for Felipe and John. Bad luck guys. You did well.

UPDATE 1: My congratulations to the MSM, for without their support, this would have never happened. We drink anything that is offered for free - Even if it is "Phenoyl". We are all boneheaded and without the MSM, the eyes of millions that were closed because of ignorance, would have never been opened. We are indebted to you for opening so many eyes. I can now declare MISSION ACCOMPLISHED.

UPDATE 2: Now that it is over, the banner goes down.

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

CORE 06: Obama's Economics - The Depressing Hilarity

I read this in the comments section of a Obama's ex-speechwriter blog. This was extremely hilarious and sad but true. He goes on to quote, which by the way is my philosophy too.

'For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.'

And now here for the welfare, (oops, I mean the tax-cut) that Obama offers, here is a story that a Professor of Economics at University of Georgia (Dr. David R. Kamerschen) had to say. Trust me, this was exactly what I was thinking when I heard about the underlying details. That is why he is a professor and I am a blogger. Now to the story.

Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay $1.
The sixth would pay $3.
The seventh would pay $7.
The eighth would pay $12.
The ninth would pay $18..
The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59..

So, that's what they decided to do. The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve.

"Since you are all such good customers", he said, "I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20." Drinks for the ten now cost just $80.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes and so the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free.

But what about the other six men - the paying customers? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his 'fair share'?'

They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer.

So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.

And so:

The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).
The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33% savings).
The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28% savings).
The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).
The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).
The tenth now paid $50 instead of $59 (15% savings).

Each of the six was better off than before.

And the first four continued to drink for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings. "I only got a dollar out of the $20" declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man, "But he got $9!"

"Yeah, that's right" exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a dollar, too. It's unfair that he got nine times more than I!"

"That's true!!" shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get $9 back when I got only $2? The wealthy get all the breaks!" 

"Wait a minute" yelled the first four men in unison. "We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor."

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth man didn't show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!

And that is how our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction.

Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.


Tuesday, September 2, 2008

CA 02: Palin, Obama - The Experience Factor

Sarah Palin or Barrack Obama - Who has more experience

Wow. The question really made me laugh. As I write this blog, the majority of US is ganging up against Sarah Palin, the Republican VP pick. Obama went on to state that he had more experience than Palin. A presidential candidate is comparing himself to a vice-presidential candidate and says that he is better? I bet he is slapping his head right now.

Anyways, WHO IS BETTER is a question, the answer for which is heavily influenced by the media. The media is more concerned about the experience of a Vice President than that of the President. My question is simple. If the media feels that they have grilled Obama on the experience, I strongly feel that they should continue doing that (even though they actually haven't) and change their attention purely on to a new scapegoat.

I heard a comment from Wolf Blitzer on CNN that Obama was scrutinized as well on his experience, when Guiliani was asking why they are doing it to Palin. I was laughing. Are you telling me that you do not have a problem in having Obama as a President despite his inexperience, just because Palin does not have inexperience? How more irresponsible of an answer can that be?

As Obamabots go on a rampage, trashing everybody who runs against Obama, the media follows suit. FOX News' Hannity & Colmes known for its Republican support do not get as much hate as MSNBC's Keith Olbermann who is known for his equally Democratic support.

I would not blame the Main Stream media too much, because the Obamabots are like that. If you go around the articles on the internet and look at the comments section, you will see how people are. They did it to Hillary and they are doing it to Sarah now. You will find articles that questions on the lines of whether Palin being a woman, would be able to take care of her child as well as the office that she might hold. My answer is that I believe she is not divorced and she has a hale and healthy husband and of course, that is none of your freaking business. In Palin's own words, A ship is safe in the harbor but it was not built for that.

If you are suggesting that Palin has to take care of her family and not be selfish and greedy for the office, think again - In whatever way you might want to put it, you ARE a sexist. Her kid Trig being a few months old with Down syndrome would be tough but not impossible. If you think it is impossible, think again - In whatever way you might put it, you ARE a sexist.

The two main questions are about her two daughters and they even go on about asking whether McCain did not do the vetting properly. Seriously? All this is being thrown at a person who has not even finished a week into the race. I only hope that she comes out of this alive.

This kind of tactics definitely makes me hate Obama and Obamabots more. Obamabots, you heard Obama and Biden say "Kids are off-limit". If you are raised where you respect your seniors, you would know what to do, but to the best of my knowledge, you folks will not be able to stop that and so will be my growing of hatred towards you bunch.

Thursday, August 28, 2008

CORE 05: Alaska - Here I Come

Hi Ho it's off to Alaska we go. At last, the day has come. Me and my colleague Vishnu will be leaving to Alaska tomorrow early morning. I have done my packing and ready to go with a camcorder, few clothes and a ton of expectation. If the weather gods are smiling, we should have a wonderful time there.

If I have some time, may be - may be, I shall post a travelogue and turn to find a the next place on the map to where I shall go.

CID 03: McCain On Obama's Nomination - Nice Touch

I was watching CNN and saw this ad, which aired just a few minutes ago (8:30 PM EST) in CNN.




With the Republican machine going on full attack mode on all the last three days, an ad with such explicitness was like a sudden brake. Of course it is a stunt for the general public, but I liked the way the ad was delivered.

With such a huge publicity for Democrats, I doubt the Republicans will be able to match it. I will have to wait and watch how the Republicans are going to compensate for this lack of publicity.
 
My current experiment: Eyer